Jump to content



Photo

Panavision


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Jens Piotrowski SOC

Jens Piotrowski SOC

    Advanced Member

  • Sustaining Members
  • 1656 posts
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:56 AM

LA TIMES
  • 0

#2 RonBaldwin

RonBaldwin

    Advanced Member

  • Sustaining Members
  • 2351 posts
  • Los Angeles

Posted 02 March 2010 - 12:00 PM

looks like Thomas won't have to buy those little crews afterall.
  • 0

#3 Matt Petrosky

Matt Petrosky

    Advanced Member

  • Sustaining Members
  • 190 posts
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 02 March 2010 - 04:31 PM

Sounds like this could be good for PV in the long run, shedding some of that debt Perelman dumped into it years ago. Higher-ups at PV seem to think William C. Bevins is running it well and making good decisions. We shall see.

-Matt
  • 0

#4 Matt Petrosky

Matt Petrosky

    Advanced Member

  • Sustaining Members
  • 190 posts
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 02 March 2010 - 04:34 PM

And the 1000th post for Mr. Ron Baldwin!
Somebody get the man a scotch.
  • 0

#5 Jens Piotrowski SOC

Jens Piotrowski SOC

    Advanced Member

  • Sustaining Members
  • 1656 posts
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 02 March 2010 - 05:40 PM

I wonder if Cerberus Capital is going to hold onto Panavision, or sell them ones they cleaned up the financial mess.

http://en.wikipedia....erberus_Capital
  • 0




IDX

Teradek

Wireless Video Systems

Varizoom Follow Focus

GPI Pro Systems

Engineered Cinema Solutions

Ritter Battery

PLC Electronics Solutions

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Omnishot Systems

Betz Tools for Stabilizers

Boland Communications

BOXX

SkyDreams

PLC - Bartech

rebotnix Technologies