New Boland DayBrite
Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:17 PM
Do you mean the model that's 900nts?
Do sc ops consider that to be bright enough ?
Also...do you all have a need for a 5" size range with 1500 nts? I've always thought that 5" was to small for sc?
Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:27 PM
both the 450 nits and the 900 nits version have AR coated glass fronts, not bonded though.
Re: brightness. I'm using the regular brightness (450) Rainbow HD as an on-board monitor and it is plenty bright in daylight, visually much brighter than my assistants TVlogic with 1000 nits. So, having said that, i think the 900nits version should be sufficient for Steadicam.
it also has the build in level, custom zoom, flip, hdmi, sdi, cvbs, battery plates, etc
Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:40 PM
ok...thank you for the feedback. I ask because we also have a 9" (16:9) but its only 900-1000 nts. Glad to hear that unit might also be viable.
Posted 18 January 2015 - 03:35 PM
We all know the backlight Nits value does not equal visual brightness.
Time for another monitor shoot-out , I guess
Posted 18 January 2015 - 06:23 PM
Posted 19 January 2015 - 03:25 AM
This makes dynamic balance really easy and simple, it also means you don't have to stretch the monitor really far away from the rig to counter-balance the batteries on the base if you don't want to.
Posted 19 January 2015 - 03:27 AM
Regardless of people's opinions on the company the viewability of their monitors is still an excellent benchmark to compare against.
Posted 19 January 2015 - 01:31 PM
"3.9lbs is a good monitor weight"
I would prefer half that weight, and the ability to add a battery to the back of the monitor. With two batteries on the CineLive, one is often under the post and one is off the back.
Posted 19 January 2015 - 02:55 PM
Looks like the monitor is going to weigh in at about 25 oz / 1.5 lbs / .71 kg.
Viewing angle is a full 170 x170 (H&V).
Also....one of the pros testing the monitor on-set right now said that "it's off angle viewing and anit-glare are fantastic."
The protective glass is removable via 4 simple screws, so in Daylight situations there is no chance of ruining the anti-reflective properties (nor fogging up).
Posted 21 January 2015 - 09:06 AM
Re: water resistant....... It was literally under water, ocean water for a few seconds. I rinsed it off with fresh water and let it dry out in the sun. An hour or so later is was on my rig and working fine. That was close to ten years ago? The monitor is still working fine.
Posted 22 January 2015 - 12:50 PM
A digital horizon would be HUGE! Wether internal or external sensor, as long as it works properly and can hold it's calibration through whip pans. Lack of a solid digital horizon indicator a big gaping hole in the class of steadicam monitors under $3K. I would buy one of these in a heartbeat. And yes, we're all aware of SmallHD's horizon indicator, but unfortunately it's useless and needs alot of work.
Posted 26 January 2015 - 12:02 PM
Posted 26 January 2015 - 07:46 PM
Love to see it next to Small HD, Transvideo and cinetronic =)